What were some of the main motives for hijackers during the first 30 years of aviation terrorism?

During the first 30 years of aviation terrorism, many hijackers were motivated by complex social, political, and personal factors, with a significant focus on persecution, escaping prosecution, and conducting hostage-taking. This option reflects how individuals or groups often used hijacking as a tool to draw attention to their plight or grievances, especially in cases where they felt marginalized or oppressed.

For many hijackers, the act of seizing an aircraft was a desperate measure to highlight injustices or to force governments to negotiate on their behalf. By taking hostages, they aimed to secure concessions, raise awareness of their situations, or influence political outcomes. The psychological impact of hijacking also served to convey a sense of urgency or desperation regarding their cause, making it a potent tactic for those seeking to rally support or demonstrate the severity of their circumstances.

The other suggested motives do play a role in the broader context of terrorism and criminal behavior, but they do not encapsulate the primary catalysts observed in the specific instances of aviation hijacking in this period. For example, while the desire for publicity and media attention was indeed a factor, it was often a byproduct of the actions stemming from deeper issues like persecution and seeking redress for grievances. Similarly, motives centered around political standing